<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: China’s Amended TM Law Has Potential To Reduce Squatting	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.chinaiplawupdate.com/2020/01/chinas-amended-tm-law-has-potential-to-reduce-squatting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.chinaiplawupdate.com/2020/01/chinas-amended-tm-law-has-potential-to-reduce-squatting/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 05:11:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Beijing Fines Alibaba 100,000 RMB for Malicious Trademark Filings - China IP Law Update		</title>
		<link>https://www.chinaiplawupdate.com/2020/01/chinas-amended-tm-law-has-potential-to-reduce-squatting/#comment-59</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beijing Fines Alibaba 100,000 RMB for Malicious Trademark Filings - China IP Law Update]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2020 18:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinaiplawupdate.com/?p=217#comment-59</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] well as applicants themselves comes from newly amended Article 68 of the Trademark Law.  This is potentially good news to foreign entities facing squatting by Chinese trademark registrants as this shows the newly amended law has teeth and the government is willing to enforce the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] well as applicants themselves comes from newly amended Article 68 of the Trademark Law.  This is potentially good news to foreign entities facing squatting by Chinese trademark registrants as this shows the newly amended law has teeth and the government is willing to enforce the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: China&#039;s Draft Measures for the Administration of Trademark Agencies Should Further Reduce Trademark Squatting - China IP Law Update		</title>
		<link>https://www.chinaiplawupdate.com/2020/01/chinas-amended-tm-law-has-potential-to-reduce-squatting/#comment-55</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[China&#039;s Draft Measures for the Administration of Trademark Agencies Should Further Reduce Trademark Squatting - China IP Law Update]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 19:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinaiplawupdate.com/?p=217#comment-55</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] how enforcement against trademark agencies and practitioners will proceed for violations of the newly amended trademark law.  Specifically, Article 4 of the Trademark Law was amended to read, &#8220;Applications for [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] how enforcement against trademark agencies and practitioners will proceed for violations of the newly amended trademark law.  Specifically, Article 4 of the Trademark Law was amended to read, &#8220;Applications for [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: China&#039;s New Civil Code Includes Punitive Damages in Intentional Intellectual Property Infringement - China IP Law Update		</title>
		<link>https://www.chinaiplawupdate.com/2020/01/chinas-amended-tm-law-has-potential-to-reduce-squatting/#comment-24</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[China&#039;s New Civil Code Includes Punitive Damages in Intentional Intellectual Property Infringement - China IP Law Update]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2020 18:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinaiplawupdate.com/?p=217#comment-24</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] have the right to request corresponding punitive damages.&#8221;  This actually aligns with the newly amended trademark law that provides for increased punitive damages. Article 63 of the trademark law, as amended in [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] have the right to request corresponding punitive damages.&#8221;  This actually aligns with the newly amended trademark law that provides for increased punitive damages. Article 63 of the trademark law, as amended in [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Beijing Fines Alibaba for Malicious Registration of Coronavirus Chinese Trademarks - China IP Law Update		</title>
		<link>https://www.chinaiplawupdate.com/2020/01/chinas-amended-tm-law-has-potential-to-reduce-squatting/#comment-11</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beijing Fines Alibaba for Malicious Registration of Coronavirus Chinese Trademarks - China IP Law Update]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2020 21:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinaiplawupdate.com/?p=217#comment-11</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] well as applicants themselves comes from newly amended Article 68 of the Trademark Law.  This is potentially good news to foreign entities facing squatting by Chinese trademark registrants as this shows the newly amended law has teeth and the government is willing to enforce the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] well as applicants themselves comes from newly amended Article 68 of the Trademark Law.  This is potentially good news to foreign entities facing squatting by Chinese trademark registrants as this shows the newly amended law has teeth and the government is willing to enforce the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>