<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Michael Jordan Prevails in Eight-Year Trademark Battle at China&#8217;s Supreme People&#8217;s Court	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.chinaiplawupdate.com/2020/04/michael-jordan-prevails-in-eight-year-trademark-battle-at-chinas-supreme-peoples-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.chinaiplawupdate.com/2020/04/michael-jordan-prevails-in-eight-year-trademark-battle-at-chinas-supreme-peoples-court/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 05:11:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: China&#039;s Patent Office Invalidates Chinese Shoe Design Patent Using the ASICS Stripes Trademark - China IP Law Update		</title>
		<link>https://www.chinaiplawupdate.com/2020/04/michael-jordan-prevails-in-eight-year-trademark-battle-at-chinas-supreme-peoples-court/#comment-39</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[China&#039;s Patent Office Invalidates Chinese Shoe Design Patent Using the ASICS Stripes Trademark - China IP Law Update]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 23:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinaiplawupdate.com/?p=333#comment-39</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] uses ASICS Corporation&#8217;s  trademarked stripes logo.  Competitor Qiaodan Sports Co. Ltd. (notorious for using Michael Jordan&#8217;s Chinese name as their company name and in trademarks, etc.) filed design patent application 201430367626.7 on September 29, 2014, which was granted on [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] uses ASICS Corporation&#8217;s  trademarked stripes logo.  Competitor Qiaodan Sports Co. Ltd. (notorious for using Michael Jordan&#8217;s Chinese name as their company name and in trademarks, etc.) filed design patent application 201430367626.7 on September 29, 2014, which was granted on [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Under Armour Defeats Uncle Martian at China&#039;s Supreme People&#039;s Court in Trademark Battle - China IP Law Update		</title>
		<link>https://www.chinaiplawupdate.com/2020/04/michael-jordan-prevails-in-eight-year-trademark-battle-at-chinas-supreme-peoples-court/#comment-36</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Under Armour Defeats Uncle Martian at China&#039;s Supreme People&#039;s Court in Trademark Battle - China IP Law Update]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 18:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinaiplawupdate.com/?p=333#comment-36</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] ruling follows a string of trademark and unfair competition victories for foreigners including Michael Jordan, New Balance, and Christian [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] ruling follows a string of trademark and unfair competition victories for foreigners including Michael Jordan, New Balance, and Christian [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>