<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel> <title> Comments on: Michael Jordan Prevails in Eight-Year Trademark Battle at China’s Supreme People’s Court </title> <atom:link href="https://www.chinaiplawupdate.com/2020/04/michael-jordan-prevails-in-eight-year-trademark-battle-at-chinas-supreme-peoples-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /> <link>https://www.chinaiplawupdate.com/2020/04/michael-jordan-prevails-in-eight-year-trademark-battle-at-chinas-supreme-peoples-court/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 05:11:15 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod> hourly </sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency> 1 </sy:updateFrequency> <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2</generator> <item> <title> By: China's Patent Office Invalidates Chinese Shoe Design Patent Using the ASICS Stripes Trademark - China IP Law Update </title> <link>https://www.chinaiplawupdate.com/2020/04/michael-jordan-prevails-in-eight-year-trademark-battle-at-chinas-supreme-peoples-court/#comment-39</link> <dc:creator><![CDATA[China's Patent Office Invalidates Chinese Shoe Design Patent Using the ASICS Stripes Trademark - China IP Law Update]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 23:38:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinaiplawupdate.com/?p=333#comment-39</guid> <description><![CDATA[[…] uses ASICS Corporation’s trademarked stripes logo. Competitor Qiaodan Sports Co. Ltd. (notorious for using Michael Jordan’s Chinese name as their company name and in trademarks, etc.) filed design patent application 201430367626.7 on September 29, 2014, which was granted on […]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] uses ASICS Corporation’s trademarked stripes logo. Competitor Qiaodan Sports Co. Ltd. (notorious for using Michael Jordan’s Chinese name as their company name and in trademarks, etc.) filed design patent application 201430367626.7 on September 29, 2014, which was granted on […]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item> <title> By: Under Armour Defeats Uncle Martian at China's Supreme People's Court in Trademark Battle - China IP Law Update </title> <link>https://www.chinaiplawupdate.com/2020/04/michael-jordan-prevails-in-eight-year-trademark-battle-at-chinas-supreme-peoples-court/#comment-36</link> <dc:creator><![CDATA[Under Armour Defeats Uncle Martian at China's Supreme People's Court in Trademark Battle - China IP Law Update]]></dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 18:40:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinaiplawupdate.com/?p=333#comment-36</guid> <description><![CDATA[[…] ruling follows a string of trademark and unfair competition victories for foreigners including Michael Jordan, New Balance, and Christian […]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] ruling follows a string of trademark and unfair competition victories for foreigners including Michael Jordan, New Balance, and Christian […]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>