{"id":1038,"date":"2021-01-21T22:34:00","date_gmt":"2021-01-21T22:34:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/?p=1038"},"modified":"2021-03-08T05:02:58","modified_gmt":"2021-03-08T05:02:58","slug":"shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Shell Awarded 5.5 Million RMB in Chinese Trademark Infringement Case"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On January 21, 2021, the <a href=\"http:\/\/bjzcfy.chinacourt.gov.cn\/index.shtml\">Beijing Intellectual Property Court<\/a> announced the <a href=\"https:\/\/mp.weixin.qq.com\/s\/GqX-HdMbChLYX8D9dSPa2g\">awarding of 5.5 Million RMB<\/a> (~$851 thousand USD) in damages and expenses to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shell.com\/\">Shell International<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shell.com.cn\/en_cn.html\">Shell China<\/a> for trademark infringement regarding automobile lubricants. The Court also awarded an injunction against the 5 defendants:\u00a0 corporations North Shell Company (<a href=\"http:\/\/northshell.net\/\">\u5317\u58f3\u516c\u53f8<\/a>), Jianchi Company (\u5251\u9a70\u516c\u53f8) , Annaichi Company (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.annaichi.net\/en\/\">\u5b89\u8010\u9a70\u516c\u53f8<\/a>), and persons Wang and Song.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Shell International owns trademarks including &#8220;\u58f3\u724c&#8221;, &#8220;SHELL&#8221;, &#8220;\u559c\u529b&#8221; and &#8220;HELIX&#8221; in class 4 for lubricants and licensed Shell China to use the trademarks. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants jointly produced and sold lubricant products that infringed the plaintiff\u2019s trademark rights without the permission of the trademark registrant and requested 50 million RMB in damages and 1 million RMB in expenses.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_1039\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1039\" style=\"width: 679px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-1039\" src=\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/SheH.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"679\" height=\"301\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/SheH.jpg 679w, https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/SheH-300x133.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 709px) 85vw, (max-width: 909px) 67vw, (max-width: 984px) 61vw, (max-width: 1362px) 45vw, 600px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-1039\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Infringing Products<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone  wp-image-1040\" src=\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Shell.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"670\" height=\"191\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Shell.jpg 710w, https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Shell-300x85.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 709px) 85vw, (max-width: 909px) 67vw, (max-width: 984px) 61vw, (max-width: 1362px) 45vw, 600px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The Court stated that as the infringement occurred both before and after the newly amended trademark law went into effect, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/01\/chinas-amended-tm-law-has-potential-to-reduce-squatting\/\">newly amended trademark law<\/a> would control, which allows for higher damages.<\/p>\n<p>The defendants North Shell Company and Jianchi Company were found to infringe for producing and selling infringing products with marks likely to confusion.\u00a0 For example, HLIEX instead of HELIX and SheH instead of Shell along with the Shell logo as seen above.<\/p>\n<p>The Court also stated there was joint infringement. The defendant Wang and the defendant Song are married, and they invested in the establishment of the defendant Annaichi Company, serving as legal representative and supervisor respectively. At the same time, the defendant Wang was the legal representative of the Defendant North Shell Company, and the legal representative and shareholder of the Defendant Jianchi Company. The defendant Song is a 90% shareholder of the defendant North Shell Company.<\/p>\n<p>Based on the above facts, it can be seen that Wang and Song are the actual controllers of the corporate defendants. They have control with regard to the production and sale of the alleged infringing lubricant products. The two persons know of and directly participated in the production and sales of the alleged infringing lubricant products.\u00a0 Therefore, it must be determined that they have jointly committed the infringement of the plaintiff\u2019s exclusive right to use the registered trademarks and should bear joint liability.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>In addition, the defendant Annaichi and the defendant Song provided accounts to collect payment, and the Annaichi registered trademarks similar to the plaintiff\u2019s trademark and permitted other defendants to use them, which constituted assistance in the production and sale of lubricants for trademark infringement. Therefore, defendants Annaichi , Wang and Song should bear joint liability with defendants North Shell and Jianchi.<\/p>\n<p>In terms of damages, as the plaintiffs did not provide evidence to prove its economic loss nor defendants&#8217; gains, the Court awarded 5 million RMB (the maximum statutory damages allowed in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/01\/chinas-amended-tm-law-has-potential-to-reduce-squatting\/\">amended trademark law<\/a>) instead of 50 million RMB as requested.<\/p>\n<p>The case is under appeal and as of the time of publication North Shell is continuing to use Shell International&#8217;s trademarks on its website.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p class=\"excerpt\">On January 21, 2021, the Beijing Intellectual Property Court announced the awarding of 5.5 Million RMB (~$851 thousand USD) in damages and expenses to Shell International and Shell China for trademark infringement regarding automobile lubricants. The Court also awarded an injunction against the 5 defendants:\u00a0 corporations North Shell Company (\u5317\u58f3\u516c\u53f8), Jianchi Company (\u5251\u9a70\u516c\u53f8) , Annaichi Company (\u5b89\u8010\u9a70\u516c\u53f8), and persons Wang and Song.<\/p>\n<p class=\"more-link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/\" class=\"button\">Continue Reading<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,4],"tags":[],"coauthors":[22],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v22.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Shell Awarded 5.5 Million RMB in Chinese Trademark Infringement Case - China IP Law Update<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shell Awarded 5.5 Million RMB in Chinese Trademark Infringement Case - China IP Law Update\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On January 21, 2021, the Beijing Intellectual Property Court announced the awarding of 5.5 Million RMB (~$851 thousand USD) in damages and expenses to Shell International and Shell China for trademark infringement regarding automobile lubricants. The Court also awarded an injunction against the 5 defendants:\u00a0 corporations North Shell Company (\u5317\u58f3\u516c\u53f8), Jianchi Company (\u5251\u9a70\u516c\u53f8) , Annaichi Company (\u5b89\u8010\u9a70\u516c\u53f8), and persons Wang and Song.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"China IP Law Update\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-01-21T22:34:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-03-08T05:02:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/SheH.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Aaron Wininger\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Aaron Wininger\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Aaron Wininger\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5\"},\"headline\":\"Shell Awarded 5.5 Million RMB in Chinese Trademark Infringement Case\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-01-21T22:34:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-03-08T05:02:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/\"},\"wordCount\":486,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/SheH.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case\",\"Trademarks\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/\",\"name\":\"Shell Awarded 5.5 Million RMB in Chinese Trademark Infringement Case - China IP Law Update\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/SheH.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-01-21T22:34:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-03-08T05:02:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/SheH.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/SheH.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shell Awarded 5.5 Million RMB in Chinese Trademark Infringement Case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/\",\"name\":\"China IP Law Update\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"China IP Law Update\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png\",\"width\":240,\"height\":81,\"caption\":\"China IP Law Update\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5\",\"name\":\"Aaron Wininger\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/2a4c57b1fc56e213ed27e140da54c8a1\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Aaron Wininger\"},\"description\":\"Aaron Wininger is a Principal and Director of the China Intellectual Property at Schwegman Lundberg &amp; Woessner.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/aaron-wininger\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/aaron-wininger-135113\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/author\/aaron-wininger\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shell Awarded 5.5 Million RMB in Chinese Trademark Infringement Case - China IP Law Update","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shell Awarded 5.5 Million RMB in Chinese Trademark Infringement Case - China IP Law Update","og_description":"On January 21, 2021, the Beijing Intellectual Property Court announced the awarding of 5.5 Million RMB (~$851 thousand USD) in damages and expenses to Shell International and Shell China for trademark infringement regarding automobile lubricants. The Court also awarded an injunction against the 5 defendants:\u00a0 corporations North Shell Company (\u5317\u58f3\u516c\u53f8), Jianchi Company (\u5251\u9a70\u516c\u53f8) , Annaichi Company (\u5b89\u8010\u9a70\u516c\u53f8), and persons Wang and Song.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/","og_site_name":"China IP Law Update","article_published_time":"2021-01-21T22:34:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-03-08T05:02:58+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/SheH.jpg"}],"author":"Aaron Wininger","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Aaron Wininger","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/"},"author":{"name":"Aaron Wininger","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5"},"headline":"Shell Awarded 5.5 Million RMB in Chinese Trademark Infringement Case","datePublished":"2021-01-21T22:34:00+00:00","dateModified":"2021-03-08T05:02:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/"},"wordCount":486,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/SheH.jpg","articleSection":["Case","Trademarks"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/","name":"Shell Awarded 5.5 Million RMB in Chinese Trademark Infringement Case - China IP Law Update","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/SheH.jpg","datePublished":"2021-01-21T22:34:00+00:00","dateModified":"2021-03-08T05:02:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/SheH.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/SheH.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/01\/shell-awarded-5-5-million-rmb-in-chinese-trademark-infringement-case\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shell Awarded 5.5 Million RMB in Chinese Trademark Infringement Case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/","name":"China IP Law Update","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization","name":"China IP Law Update","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png","width":240,"height":81,"caption":"China IP Law Update"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5","name":"Aaron Wininger","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/2a4c57b1fc56e213ed27e140da54c8a1","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg","caption":"Aaron Wininger"},"description":"Aaron Wininger is a Principal and Director of the China Intellectual Property at Schwegman Lundberg &amp; Woessner.","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/aaron-wininger\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/aaron-wininger-135113\/"],"url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/author\/aaron-wininger\/"}]}},"co_authors":[4],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1038"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1038"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1038\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1043,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1038\/revisions\/1043"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1038"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1038"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1038"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=1038"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}