{"id":1828,"date":"2021-12-08T11:34:15","date_gmt":"2021-12-08T11:34:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/?p=1828"},"modified":"2021-12-08T00:34:35","modified_gmt":"2021-12-08T00:34:35","slug":"guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Guangdong Higher People’s Court Rules for Tencent in China’s First Game Map Copyright Case"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On December 6, 2021, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.gdcourts.gov.cn\/\">Guangdong Higher People’s Court<\/a> publicly <a href=\"http:\/\/www.gdcourts.gov.cn\/index.php?v=show&cid=173&id=56357\">announced<\/a> a ruling in favor of Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd. (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.qq.com\/\">\u6df1\u5733\u5e02\u817e\u8baf\u8ba1\u7b97\u673a\u7cfb\u7edf\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8<\/a>) in a dispute over copyright infringement and unfair competition relating to maps used in first person shooter games.\u00a0 The Court ordered the defendants Changyou Yunduan (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd. (\u4e0e\u7545\u6e38\u4e91\u7aef\uff08\u5317\u4eac\uff09\u79d1\u6280\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8) and\u00a0 Hero Entertainment Co., Ltd. (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.hero.com\/\">\u82f1\u96c4\u4e92\u5a31\u79d1\u6280\u80a1\u4efd\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8<\/a>) to cease infringement and compensate Tencent for economic losses of 25 million RMB. This is believed to be the first time in China that a judgment has been issued for a dispute over infringement of game map copying. <!--more--><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-large wp-image-1829\" src=\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/CF-1024x547.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"840\" height=\"449\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/CF-1024x547.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/CF-300x160.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/CF-768x410.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/CF-1536x820.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/CF-1200x641.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/CF.jpg 1884w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 709px) 85vw, (max-width: 909px) 67vw, (max-width: 1362px) 62vw, 840px\" \/>The Court stated that “<a href=\"https:\/\/cf.qq.com\/main.shtml\">Cross Fire<\/a>” (\u7a7f\u8d8a\u706b\u7ebf) was launched in 2007 and has a large following. This game is developed by a South Korean company, and Tencent is its sole distributor in mainland China. “Crisis Action” (\u5168\u6c11\u67aa\u6218) is a mobile shooter online game developed by Changyou Cloud Company and operated and promoted by Hero Interactive Entertainment. In 2017, Tencent sued Changyou Cloud Co., Ltd. and Hero Interactive Entertainment Co., Ltd. for copyright infringement and unfair competition, claiming 98 million RMB in damages. The Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court found that six maps used in “Crisis Action” constituted copyright infringement and ordered the defendants to stop the infringement and awarded\u00a0 45 million RMB in damages.<\/p>\n<p>On appeal, the Guangdong Higher People’s Court held that the virtual space built by a game map is to some extent a digital expression of a simulated real world and an important platform for realizing virtual and real interaction, and when the spatial layout structure of a game map is sufficiently specific and conforms to the characteristics of a graphic work, the game map can be protected as a graphic work.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The Court also held that persons can only claim copyright for content of his or her own creation, and that any element in the public domain and content without originality will be excluded from the scope of protection under the Copyright Law.<\/p>\n<p>The Court on appeal determined that four game maps constituted infringement. As to the two game maps for which no infringement was determined, the court held that the differences between the two game maps were significant and did not constitute any substantial similarity. With regard to the amount of compensation, the Court calculated it according to the mode of “profits from Crisis Action \u00d7 contribution ratio of game maps to the game as a whole \u00d7 utilization ratio of infringing game maps versus all game maps”, and finally determined that the infringing game maps generated profits of 25 million RMB.<\/p>\n<p>The full text of the announcement is available <a href=\"http:\/\/www.gdcourts.gov.cn\/index.php?v=show&cid=173&id=56357\">here<\/a> (Chinese only).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p class=\"excerpt\">On December 6, 2021, the Guangdong Higher People’s Court publicly announced a ruling in favor of Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd. (\u6df1\u5733\u5e02\u817e\u8baf\u8ba1\u7b97\u673a\u7cfb\u7edf\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8) in a dispute over copyright infringement and unfair competition relating to maps used in first person shooter games.\u00a0 The Court ordered the defendants Changyou Yunduan (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd. (\u4e0e\u7545\u6e38\u4e91\u7aef\uff08\u5317\u4eac\uff09\u79d1\u6280\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8) and\u00a0 Hero Entertainment Co., Ltd. (\u82f1\u96c4\u4e92\u5a31\u79d1\u6280\u80a1\u4efd\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8) to cease infringement and compensate Tencent for economic losses of 25 million RMB. This is believed to be the first time …<\/p>\n<p class=\"more-link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/\" class=\"button\">Continue Reading<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,6],"tags":[],"coauthors":[22],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v22.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Guangdong Higher People's Court Rules for Tencent in China's First Game Map Copyright Case - China IP Law Update<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Guangdong Higher People's Court Rules for Tencent in China's First Game Map Copyright Case - China IP Law Update\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On December 6, 2021, the Guangdong Higher People’s Court publicly announced a ruling in favor of Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd. (\u6df1\u5733\u5e02\u817e\u8baf\u8ba1\u7b97\u673a\u7cfb\u7edf\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8) in a dispute over copyright infringement and unfair competition relating to maps used in first person shooter games.\u00a0 The Court ordered the defendants Changyou Yunduan (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd. (\u4e0e\u7545\u6e38\u4e91\u7aef\uff08\u5317\u4eac\uff09\u79d1\u6280\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8) and\u00a0 Hero Entertainment Co., Ltd. (\u82f1\u96c4\u4e92\u5a31\u79d1\u6280\u80a1\u4efd\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8) to cease infringement and compensate Tencent for economic losses of 25 million RMB. This is believed to be the first time ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"China IP Law Update\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-12-08T11:34:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-12-08T00:34:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/CF-1024x547.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Aaron Wininger\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Aaron Wininger\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Aaron Wininger\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5\"},\"headline\":\"Guangdong Higher People’s Court Rules for Tencent in China’s First Game Map Copyright Case\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-12-08T11:34:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-12-08T00:34:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/\"},\"wordCount\":433,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/CF-1024x547.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case\",\"Copyright\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/\",\"name\":\"Guangdong Higher People's Court Rules for Tencent in China's First Game Map Copyright Case - China IP Law Update\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/CF-1024x547.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-12-08T11:34:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-12-08T00:34:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/CF.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/CF.jpg\",\"width\":1884,\"height\":1006},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Guangdong Higher People’s Court Rules for Tencent in China’s First Game Map Copyright Case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/\",\"name\":\"China IP Law Update\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"China IP Law Update\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png\",\"width\":240,\"height\":81,\"caption\":\"China IP Law Update\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5\",\"name\":\"Aaron Wininger\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/2a4c57b1fc56e213ed27e140da54c8a1\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Aaron Wininger\"},\"description\":\"Aaron Wininger is a Principal and Director of the China Intellectual Property at Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/aaron-wininger\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/aaron-wininger-135113\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/author\/aaron-wininger\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Guangdong Higher People's Court Rules for Tencent in China's First Game Map Copyright Case - China IP Law Update","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Guangdong Higher People's Court Rules for Tencent in China's First Game Map Copyright Case - China IP Law Update","og_description":"On December 6, 2021, the Guangdong Higher People’s Court publicly announced a ruling in favor of Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd. (\u6df1\u5733\u5e02\u817e\u8baf\u8ba1\u7b97\u673a\u7cfb\u7edf\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8) in a dispute over copyright infringement and unfair competition relating to maps used in first person shooter games.\u00a0 The Court ordered the defendants Changyou Yunduan (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd. (\u4e0e\u7545\u6e38\u4e91\u7aef\uff08\u5317\u4eac\uff09\u79d1\u6280\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8) and\u00a0 Hero Entertainment Co., Ltd. (\u82f1\u96c4\u4e92\u5a31\u79d1\u6280\u80a1\u4efd\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8) to cease infringement and compensate Tencent for economic losses of 25 million RMB. This is believed to be the first time ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/","og_site_name":"China IP Law Update","article_published_time":"2021-12-08T11:34:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-12-08T00:34:35+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/CF-1024x547.jpg"}],"author":"Aaron Wininger","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Aaron Wininger","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/"},"author":{"name":"Aaron Wininger","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5"},"headline":"Guangdong Higher People’s Court Rules for Tencent in China’s First Game Map Copyright Case","datePublished":"2021-12-08T11:34:15+00:00","dateModified":"2021-12-08T00:34:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/"},"wordCount":433,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/CF-1024x547.jpg","articleSection":["Case","Copyright"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/","name":"Guangdong Higher People's Court Rules for Tencent in China's First Game Map Copyright Case - China IP Law Update","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/CF-1024x547.jpg","datePublished":"2021-12-08T11:34:15+00:00","dateModified":"2021-12-08T00:34:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/CF.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/CF.jpg","width":1884,"height":1006},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2021\/12\/guangdong-higher-peoples-court-rules-for-tencent-in-chinas-first-game-map-copyright-case\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Guangdong Higher People’s Court Rules for Tencent in China’s First Game Map Copyright Case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/","name":"China IP Law Update","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization","name":"China IP Law Update","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png","width":240,"height":81,"caption":"China IP Law Update"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5","name":"Aaron Wininger","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/2a4c57b1fc56e213ed27e140da54c8a1","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg","caption":"Aaron Wininger"},"description":"Aaron Wininger is a Principal and Director of the China Intellectual Property at Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner.","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/aaron-wininger\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/aaron-wininger-135113\/"],"url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/author\/aaron-wininger\/"}]}},"co_authors":[4],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1828"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1828"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1828\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1830,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1828\/revisions\/1830"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1828"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1828"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1828"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=1828"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}