{"id":2241,"date":"2022-09-08T23:20:34","date_gmt":"2022-09-08T23:20:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/?p=2241"},"modified":"2022-09-09T22:51:40","modified_gmt":"2022-09-09T22:51:40","slug":"uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/","title":{"rendered":"USPTO Issues Yet Another Show Cause Order Against a Chinese Firm for Fraudulent TM Filings"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>Update: This article has been updated to include a public response issued by respondent Shenzhen Seller Growth Network Technology Co., Ltd.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>In a show cause order dated September 7, 2022, the United Stated Patent &amp; Trademark Office (USPTO) accused Shenzhen Seller Growth Network Technology Co., Ltd, et al. of &#8220;unauthorized practice before the USPTO in trademark matters and providing false, fictitious, or fraudulent information in trademark submissions with the intent to circumvent these rules.&#8221; The order \u00a0requires Respondents to show cause as to why the USPTO should not immediately sanction Respondents. This order follows another recent order alleging Chinese firms were <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/08\/uspto-chinese-firms-used-dead-attorney-to-file-trademark-applications\/\">using a dead attorney to submit trademark application documents<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-2242\" src=\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Seller-GRowth.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"731\" height=\"610\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Seller-GRowth.jpg 731w, https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Seller-GRowth-300x250.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 709px) 85vw, (max-width: 909px) 67vw, (max-width: 984px) 61vw, (max-width: 1362px) 45vw, 600px\" \/>The USPTO stated, &#8220;that the evidence indicates that Respondents are not qualified practitioners under 37 C.F.R. \u00a7\u00a7 11.1 and 11.14, yet still engaged in the unauthorized practice of law through the use of names and bar credentials of U.S.-licensed attorneys, intentionally provided for the purpose of concealing Respondents\u2019 involvement and circumventing USPTO rules.&#8221; Further, &#8220;Respondents\u2019 efforts to mask their participation in the unauthorized practice of law include improperly entering the electronic signatures of at least three U.S.-licensed attorneys and providing false, fictitious, and\/or fraudulent attorney information in trademark filings in violation of USPTO Rules.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Potential sanctions are quite serious including the potential invalidation of over 13,000 trademarks by &#8220;strik[ing] or otherwise giv[ing] no weight to all trademark-related documents submitted by Respondents.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The respondents have until September 21, 2022 to respond. The show cause order is available <a href=\"https:\/\/www.uspto.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/documents\/tm-show-cause-order-shenzhen-seller-growth-network-tech_0.pdf\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>On September 9, 2022, Shenzhen Seller Growth Network Technology Co., Ltd. released the following statement in Chinese basically stating they are not sanctioned but instead undergoing a routine inquiry from the USPTO.\u00a0<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">The USPTO is currently conducting a routine review of the trademark agency industry in China. As the largest international intellectual property SaaS platform in China, our company has been listed in the first batch of inquiries to undergo routine review. It is currently undergoing a normal review, and there is no so-called sanctions by the USPTO, and the relevant rumors are all rumors.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Further, this &#8220;routine inquiry&#8221; will have no affect on their customers stating,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">This inquiry will not have any impact on the customers we have served and future customers. Trademarks can continue to be used normally.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The response concludes with a warning:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">Maliciously spreading rumors and smearing our company has seriously damaged the legitimate rights and interests of our company. Please stop the rumors and slander immediately and delete the untrue information that has been released. Otherwise, our company will take legal measures to pursue it to the end.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-2245\" src=\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Respondent.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"577\" height=\"830\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Respondent.jpg 577w, https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Respondent-209x300.jpg 209w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 577px) 85vw, 577px\" \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p class=\"excerpt\">Update: This article has been updated to include a public response issued by respondent Shenzhen Seller Growth Network Technology Co., Ltd. In a show cause order dated September 7, 2022, the United Stated Patent &amp; Trademark Office (USPTO) accused Shenzhen Seller Growth Network Technology Co., Ltd, et al. of &#8220;unauthorized practice before the USPTO in trademark matters and providing false, fictitious, or fraudulent information in trademark submissions with the intent to circumvent these rules.&#8221; The order \u00a0requires Respondents to show &#8230;<\/p>\n<p class=\"more-link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/\" class=\"button\">Continue Reading<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"coauthors":[22],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v22.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>USPTO Issues Yet Another Show Cause Order Against a Chinese Firm for Fraudulent TM Filings - China IP Law Update<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"USPTO Issues Yet Another Show Cause Order Against a Chinese Firm for Fraudulent TM Filings - China IP Law Update\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Update: This article has been updated to include a public response issued by respondent Shenzhen Seller Growth Network Technology Co., Ltd. In a show cause order dated September 7, 2022, the United Stated Patent &amp; Trademark Office (USPTO) accused Shenzhen Seller Growth Network Technology Co., Ltd, et al. of &#8220;unauthorized practice before the USPTO in trademark matters and providing false, fictitious, or fraudulent information in trademark submissions with the intent to circumvent these rules.&#8221; The order \u00a0requires Respondents to show ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"China IP Law Update\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-09-08T23:20:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-09-09T22:51:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Seller-GRowth.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Aaron Wininger\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Aaron Wininger\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Aaron Wininger\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5\"},\"headline\":\"USPTO Issues Yet Another Show Cause Order Against a Chinese Firm for Fraudulent TM Filings\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-09-08T23:20:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-09-09T22:51:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/\"},\"wordCount\":443,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Seller-GRowth.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Trademarks\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/\",\"name\":\"USPTO Issues Yet Another Show Cause Order Against a Chinese Firm for Fraudulent TM Filings - China IP Law Update\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Seller-GRowth.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-09-08T23:20:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-09-09T22:51:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Seller-GRowth.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Seller-GRowth.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"USPTO Issues Yet Another Show Cause Order Against a Chinese Firm for Fraudulent TM Filings\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/\",\"name\":\"China IP Law Update\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"China IP Law Update\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png\",\"width\":240,\"height\":81,\"caption\":\"China IP Law Update\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5\",\"name\":\"Aaron Wininger\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/2a4c57b1fc56e213ed27e140da54c8a1\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Aaron Wininger\"},\"description\":\"Aaron Wininger is a Principal and Director of the China Intellectual Property at Schwegman Lundberg &amp; Woessner.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/aaron-wininger\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/aaron-wininger-135113\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/author\/aaron-wininger\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"USPTO Issues Yet Another Show Cause Order Against a Chinese Firm for Fraudulent TM Filings - China IP Law Update","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"USPTO Issues Yet Another Show Cause Order Against a Chinese Firm for Fraudulent TM Filings - China IP Law Update","og_description":"Update: This article has been updated to include a public response issued by respondent Shenzhen Seller Growth Network Technology Co., Ltd. In a show cause order dated September 7, 2022, the United Stated Patent &amp; Trademark Office (USPTO) accused Shenzhen Seller Growth Network Technology Co., Ltd, et al. of &#8220;unauthorized practice before the USPTO in trademark matters and providing false, fictitious, or fraudulent information in trademark submissions with the intent to circumvent these rules.&#8221; The order \u00a0requires Respondents to show ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/","og_site_name":"China IP Law Update","article_published_time":"2022-09-08T23:20:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-09-09T22:51:40+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Seller-GRowth.jpg"}],"author":"Aaron Wininger","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Aaron Wininger","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/"},"author":{"name":"Aaron Wininger","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5"},"headline":"USPTO Issues Yet Another Show Cause Order Against a Chinese Firm for Fraudulent TM Filings","datePublished":"2022-09-08T23:20:34+00:00","dateModified":"2022-09-09T22:51:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/"},"wordCount":443,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Seller-GRowth.jpg","articleSection":["Trademarks"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/","name":"USPTO Issues Yet Another Show Cause Order Against a Chinese Firm for Fraudulent TM Filings - China IP Law Update","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Seller-GRowth.jpg","datePublished":"2022-09-08T23:20:34+00:00","dateModified":"2022-09-09T22:51:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Seller-GRowth.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Seller-GRowth.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/uspto-issues-yet-another-show-cause-order-against-a-chinese-firm-for-fraudulent-tm-filings\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"USPTO Issues Yet Another Show Cause Order Against a Chinese Firm for Fraudulent TM Filings"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/","name":"China IP Law Update","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization","name":"China IP Law Update","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png","width":240,"height":81,"caption":"China IP Law Update"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5","name":"Aaron Wininger","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/2a4c57b1fc56e213ed27e140da54c8a1","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg","caption":"Aaron Wininger"},"description":"Aaron Wininger is a Principal and Director of the China Intellectual Property at Schwegman Lundberg &amp; Woessner.","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/aaron-wininger\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/aaron-wininger-135113\/"],"url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/author\/aaron-wininger\/"}]}},"co_authors":[4],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2241"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2241"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2241\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2247,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2241\/revisions\/2247"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2241"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2241"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2241"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=2241"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}