{"id":2248,"date":"2022-09-09T23:19:47","date_gmt":"2022-09-09T23:19:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/?p=2248"},"modified":"2022-09-09T23:23:42","modified_gmt":"2022-09-09T23:23:42","slug":"christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Christian Louboutin Wins at Beijing IP Court in Red Sole Unfair Competition Case"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On September 9, 2022, the <a href=\"http:\/\/bjzcfy.chinacourt.gov.cn\/index.shtml\">Beijing IP Court<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/mp.weixin.qq.com\/s?__biz=MzI3OTA3MjQ3Mw==&amp;mid=2650295928&amp;idx=1&amp;sn=64693fde5d7be749e0461a0f8bdf738a&amp;chksm=f341b5cec4363cd8fe4ce8ed709f2de28979a83ef75f0e9a2cc979c773637c0f1353740d3729&amp;scene=90&amp;subscene=93&amp;sessionid=1662739979&amp;clicktime=1662740374&amp;enterid=1662740374&amp;ascene=56&amp;devicetype=android-33&amp;version=28001541&amp;nettype=WIFI&amp;abtest_cookie=AAACAA%3D%3D&amp;lang=en&amp;session_us=gh_79adcf84d692&amp;exportkey=AQJ0PL7xnXJxMohpoLrM8DY%3D&amp;pass_ticket=BuoJNLsic3N2NyDiocNd533g3gKVjcHPRyEOcQLxrD2eR6AxKaYUn6KdWoyg1buk&amp;wx_header=3\">announced<\/a> it had ruled in favor of <a href=\"https:\/\/us.christianlouboutin.com\/us_en\/\">Christian Louboutin<\/a> against Guangdong Wanlima Industrial Co., Ltd. (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.wanlima.com.cn\/\">\u5e7f\u4e1c\u4e07\u91cc\u9a6c\u5b9e\u4e1a\u80a1\u4efd\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8<\/a>) in an unfair competition case involving red soled shoes. Louboutin was awarded 5 million RMB and an injunction. Louboutin sued at the Beijing Intellectual Property Court claiming Wanlima was selling women&#8217;s shoes with the same red sole online and in department stores thereby violating the Anti-Unfair Competition Law.\u00a0 Anti-Unfair Competition suits are becoming a valuable enforcement method for foreign companies to enforce IP rights in China when trademarks are unavailable such as in the earlier <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/04\/new-balance-scores-chinese-unfair-competition-victory-against-new-barlun\/\">New Balance\/Barlun<\/a> case.<!--more--><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_2249\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2249\" style=\"width: 622px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-2249\" src=\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/InfringingShoes.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"622\" height=\"814\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/InfringingShoes.jpg 622w, https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/InfringingShoes-229x300.jpg 229w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 709px) 85vw, (max-width: 909px) 67vw, (max-width: 984px) 61vw, (max-width: 1362px) 45vw, 600px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-2249\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Defendant&#8217;s infringing shoe with red sole.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Christian Louboutin\u00a0 is a French fashion designer whose high-end stiletto footwear incorporates shiny, red-lacquered soles that have become his signature and his company has been sold the red-soled shoes since 1992. Louboutin\u00a0 argued that his ladies&#8217; high-heeled shoes with red soles are well-known in China and around the world, and are well known to the relevant public.\u00a0 The red sole decoration of Louboutin\u00a0 has a high significance, which is a unique design of ladies&#8217; high-heeled shoes, and has established a unique and stable corresponding relationship with Louboutin&#8217;s company, which constitutes a certain influential product decoration.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Louboutin contented that Wanlima sold red-soled shoes at the Wanlima counter of the New World Department Store, online on the official flagship store of Tmall Wanlima footwear and at the Beijing Yixi New World Department Store Co.\u00a0 The behavior of the defendants has the malicious intention of freeriding off of the plaintiff&#8217;s reputation thereby violating\u00a0Article 6(1) of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law.<\/p>\n<p>The Beijing IP Court explained that\u00a0<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">Louboutin&#8217;s Company submitted relevant evidence to show that it has actually sold footwear products in mainland China since 2011, with a sales volume of more than 900 million RMB.\u00a0 The shoe sales and the advertising and media includes many well-known outlets across the country, covering many parts of the country. Based on the above evidence, it is sufficient to prove that its red sole shoe and red sole decoration have a high market reputation, have established stable connections with the relevant public, and have the distinctive feature of distinguishing the source of the goods. Therefore, Christie&#8217;s &#8220;red-soled shoes&#8221; trade name and the decoration with red sole color are the trade names and decoration marks with &#8220;certain influence&#8221; as referred to in Article 6(1) of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law. Wanlima Company used the same or similar trade names and red sole decoration of \u201cRed Sole Shoes\u201d which had certain influence with Louboutin&#8217;s Company without authorization, which was enough to cause misunderstanding that it had some specific connection with Louboutin&#8217;s Company, and its behavior violated the provisions of Article 6(1) of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, which constitutes unfair competition.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Accordingly, the Beijing IP Court issued an injunction and awarded 5 million RMB in damages and 445 thousand RMB for expenditures in pursuing the case.<\/p>\n<p>The full announcement is available <a href=\"https:\/\/mp.weixin.qq.com\/s?__biz=MzI3OTA3MjQ3Mw==&amp;mid=2650295928&amp;idx=1&amp;sn=64693fde5d7be749e0461a0f8bdf738a&amp;chksm=f341b5cec4363cd8fe4ce8ed709f2de28979a83ef75f0e9a2cc979c773637c0f1353740d3729&amp;scene=90&amp;subscene=93&amp;sessionid=1662739979&amp;clicktime=1662740374&amp;enterid=1662740374&amp;ascene=56&amp;devicetype=android-33&amp;version=28001541&amp;nettype=WIFI&amp;abtest_cookie=AAACAA%3D%3D&amp;lang=en&amp;session_us=gh_79adcf84d692&amp;exportkey=AQJ0PL7xnXJxMohpoLrM8DY%3D&amp;pass_ticket=BuoJNLsic3N2NyDiocNd533g3gKVjcHPRyEOcQLxrD2eR6AxKaYUn6KdWoyg1buk&amp;wx_header=3\">here<\/a> (Chinese only).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p class=\"excerpt\">On September 9, 2022, the Beijing IP Court announced it had ruled in favor of Christian Louboutin against Guangdong Wanlima Industrial Co., Ltd. (\u5e7f\u4e1c\u4e07\u91cc\u9a6c\u5b9e\u4e1a\u80a1\u4efd\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8) in an unfair competition case involving red soled shoes. Louboutin was awarded 5 million RMB and an injunction. Louboutin sued at the Beijing Intellectual Property Court claiming Wanlima was selling women&#8217;s shoes with the same red sole online and in department stores thereby violating the Anti-Unfair Competition Law.\u00a0 Anti-Unfair Competition suits are becoming a valuable enforcement &#8230;<\/p>\n<p class=\"more-link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/\" class=\"button\">Continue Reading<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,4],"tags":[],"coauthors":[22],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v22.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Christian Louboutin Wins at Beijing IP Court in Red Sole Unfair Competition Case - China IP Law Update<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Christian Louboutin Wins at Beijing IP Court in Red Sole Unfair Competition Case - China IP Law Update\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On September 9, 2022, the Beijing IP Court announced it had ruled in favor of Christian Louboutin against Guangdong Wanlima Industrial Co., Ltd. (\u5e7f\u4e1c\u4e07\u91cc\u9a6c\u5b9e\u4e1a\u80a1\u4efd\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8) in an unfair competition case involving red soled shoes. Louboutin was awarded 5 million RMB and an injunction. Louboutin sued at the Beijing Intellectual Property Court claiming Wanlima was selling women&#8217;s shoes with the same red sole online and in department stores thereby violating the Anti-Unfair Competition Law.\u00a0 Anti-Unfair Competition suits are becoming a valuable enforcement ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"China IP Law Update\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-09-09T23:19:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-09-09T23:23:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/InfringingShoes.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Aaron Wininger\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Aaron Wininger\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Aaron Wininger\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5\"},\"headline\":\"Christian Louboutin Wins at Beijing IP Court in Red Sole Unfair Competition Case\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-09-09T23:19:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-09-09T23:23:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/\"},\"wordCount\":500,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/InfringingShoes.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case\",\"Trademarks\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/\",\"name\":\"Christian Louboutin Wins at Beijing IP Court in Red Sole Unfair Competition Case - China IP Law Update\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/InfringingShoes.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-09-09T23:19:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-09-09T23:23:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/InfringingShoes.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/InfringingShoes.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Christian Louboutin Wins at Beijing IP Court in Red Sole Unfair Competition Case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/\",\"name\":\"China IP Law Update\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"China IP Law Update\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png\",\"width\":240,\"height\":81,\"caption\":\"China IP Law Update\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5\",\"name\":\"Aaron Wininger\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/2a4c57b1fc56e213ed27e140da54c8a1\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Aaron Wininger\"},\"description\":\"Aaron Wininger is a Principal and Director of the China Intellectual Property at Schwegman Lundberg &amp; Woessner.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/aaron-wininger\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/aaron-wininger-135113\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/author\/aaron-wininger\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Christian Louboutin Wins at Beijing IP Court in Red Sole Unfair Competition Case - China IP Law Update","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Christian Louboutin Wins at Beijing IP Court in Red Sole Unfair Competition Case - China IP Law Update","og_description":"On September 9, 2022, the Beijing IP Court announced it had ruled in favor of Christian Louboutin against Guangdong Wanlima Industrial Co., Ltd. (\u5e7f\u4e1c\u4e07\u91cc\u9a6c\u5b9e\u4e1a\u80a1\u4efd\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8) in an unfair competition case involving red soled shoes. Louboutin was awarded 5 million RMB and an injunction. Louboutin sued at the Beijing Intellectual Property Court claiming Wanlima was selling women&#8217;s shoes with the same red sole online and in department stores thereby violating the Anti-Unfair Competition Law.\u00a0 Anti-Unfair Competition suits are becoming a valuable enforcement ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/","og_site_name":"China IP Law Update","article_published_time":"2022-09-09T23:19:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-09-09T23:23:42+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/InfringingShoes.jpg"}],"author":"Aaron Wininger","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Aaron Wininger","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/"},"author":{"name":"Aaron Wininger","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5"},"headline":"Christian Louboutin Wins at Beijing IP Court in Red Sole Unfair Competition Case","datePublished":"2022-09-09T23:19:47+00:00","dateModified":"2022-09-09T23:23:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/"},"wordCount":500,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/InfringingShoes.jpg","articleSection":["Case","Trademarks"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/","name":"Christian Louboutin Wins at Beijing IP Court in Red Sole Unfair Competition Case - China IP Law Update","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/InfringingShoes.jpg","datePublished":"2022-09-09T23:19:47+00:00","dateModified":"2022-09-09T23:23:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/InfringingShoes.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/InfringingShoes.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2022\/09\/christian-louboutin-wins-at-beijing-ip-court-in-red-sole-unfair-competition-case\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Christian Louboutin Wins at Beijing IP Court in Red Sole Unfair Competition Case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/","name":"China IP Law Update","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization","name":"China IP Law Update","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png","width":240,"height":81,"caption":"China IP Law Update"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5","name":"Aaron Wininger","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/2a4c57b1fc56e213ed27e140da54c8a1","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg","caption":"Aaron Wininger"},"description":"Aaron Wininger is a Principal and Director of the China Intellectual Property at Schwegman Lundberg &amp; Woessner.","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/aaron-wininger\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/aaron-wininger-135113\/"],"url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/author\/aaron-wininger\/"}]}},"co_authors":[4],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2248"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2248"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2248\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2253,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2248\/revisions\/2253"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2248"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2248"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2248"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=2248"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}