{"id":2444,"date":"2023-02-23T01:52:01","date_gmt":"2023-02-23T01:52:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/?p=2444"},"modified":"2023-02-23T01:52:44","modified_gmt":"2023-02-23T01:52:44","slug":"contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/","title":{"rendered":"Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (CATL) Scores 35.8 Million RMB Patent Infringement Victory Against CALB"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In a filing with the Hong Kong Stock Exchange dated February 21, 2023, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.calb-tech.com\/\">CALB Group Col., Ltd.<\/a> (\u4e2d\u5275\u65b0\u822a\u79d1\u6280\u96c6\u5718\u80a1\u4efd\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8) announced that the Fuzhou Intermediate People’s Court ruled against it in a patent infringement lawsuit for lithium-ion batteries. The Court awarded <a href=\"https:\/\/www.catl.com\/en\/\">Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited<\/a> (CATL), the world’s largest EV battery producer, 35.8 million RMB in damages, 798 thousand RMB for provisional patent protection (from the time of the patent application publication), over 202 thousand RMB for reasonable expenses, and an injunction. CALB said it would appeal and is also awaiting a ruling from the <a href=\"http:\/\/cnipa.gov.cn\">China National Intellectual Property Administration<\/a> (CNIPA) on the validity of the patent at issue.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-2445\" src=\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/CALB.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"604\" height=\"241\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/CALB.jpg 604w, https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/CALB-300x120.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 709px) 85vw, (max-width: 909px) 67vw, (max-width: 984px) 61vw, (max-width: 1362px) 45vw, 600px\" \/>From the abstract of the U.S. patent corresponding to the <a href=\"https:\/\/patents.google.com\/patent\/CN110010851B\/en?oq=CN110010851b\">Chinese patent CN110010851B<\/a> (ZL201910295365.4), the invention\u00a0<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt;\">provides a negative electrode plate and a battery, the negative electrode plate comprises a negative current collector and a negative film, the negative film is provided on at least one surface of the negative current collector and comprises a negative active material. The negative active material comprises graphite, and an OI value of the negative film represented by V<sub class=\"style-scope patent-text\">OI\u00a0<\/sub>and a pressing density of the negative film represented by PD satisfy a relationship: 0.7\u2264(80\/V<sub class=\"style-scope patent-text\">OI<\/sub>+43\/PD)\u00d7PD\/V<sub class=\"style-scope patent-text\">OI<\/sub>\u226421.5, where a unit of the pressing density of the negative film represented by PD is g\/cm<sup class=\"style-scope patent-text\">3<\/sup>. The battery of the present disclosure can have the characteristics of fast charging speed, high energy density, good safety performance and long cycle life at the same time.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>CATL has previously sued CALB for patent infringement of five other patents involving positive electrode plate batteries, explosion-proof devices, current collector components and batteries, lithium batteries, power battery top cover structures, and other batteries, with the claimed amount of up to 188 million RMB.<\/p>\n<p>CATL previously was awarded an injunction and over 2.6 million RMB in a lawsuit against CALB for patent infringement of <a href=\"https:\/\/patents.google.com\/patent\/CN108258180B\/en?oq=CN108258180B\">CN108258180B<\/a> (ZL201810039458.6), which CALB is also appealing.<\/p>\n<p>The filing is available here <a href=\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/2023022100035.pdf\">2023022100035<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p class=\"excerpt\">In a filing with the Hong Kong Stock Exchange dated February 21, 2023, CALB Group Col., Ltd. (\u4e2d\u5275\u65b0\u822a\u79d1\u6280\u96c6\u5718\u80a1\u4efd\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8) announced that the Fuzhou Intermediate People’s Court ruled against it in a patent infringement lawsuit for lithium-ion batteries. The Court awarded Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (CATL), the world’s largest EV battery producer, 35.8 million RMB in damages, 798 thousand RMB for provisional patent protection (from the time of the patent application publication), over 202 thousand RMB for reasonable expenses, and an …<\/p>\n<p class=\"more-link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/\" class=\"button\">Continue Reading<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,5],"tags":[],"coauthors":[22],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v22.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (CATL) Scores 35.8 Million RMB Patent Infringement Victory Against CALB - China IP Law Update<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (CATL) Scores 35.8 Million RMB Patent Infringement Victory Against CALB - China IP Law Update\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a filing with the Hong Kong Stock Exchange dated February 21, 2023, CALB Group Col., Ltd. (\u4e2d\u5275\u65b0\u822a\u79d1\u6280\u96c6\u5718\u80a1\u4efd\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8) announced that the Fuzhou Intermediate People’s Court ruled against it in a patent infringement lawsuit for lithium-ion batteries. The Court awarded Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (CATL), the world’s largest EV battery producer, 35.8 million RMB in damages, 798 thousand RMB for provisional patent protection (from the time of the patent application publication), over 202 thousand RMB for reasonable expenses, and an ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"China IP Law Update\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-02-23T01:52:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-02-23T01:52:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/CALB.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Aaron Wininger\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Aaron Wininger\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Aaron Wininger\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5\"},\"headline\":\"Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (CATL) Scores 35.8 Million RMB Patent Infringement Victory Against CALB\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-02-23T01:52:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-02-23T01:52:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/\"},\"wordCount\":331,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/CALB.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case\",\"Patents\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/\",\"name\":\"Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (CATL) Scores 35.8 Million RMB Patent Infringement Victory Against CALB - China IP Law Update\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/CALB.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-02-23T01:52:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-02-23T01:52:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/CALB.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/CALB.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (CATL) Scores 35.8 Million RMB Patent Infringement Victory Against CALB\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/\",\"name\":\"China IP Law Update\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"China IP Law Update\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png\",\"width\":240,\"height\":81,\"caption\":\"China IP Law Update\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5\",\"name\":\"Aaron Wininger\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/2a4c57b1fc56e213ed27e140da54c8a1\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Aaron Wininger\"},\"description\":\"Aaron Wininger is a Principal and Director of the China Intellectual Property at Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/aaron-wininger\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/aaron-wininger-135113\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/author\/aaron-wininger\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (CATL) Scores 35.8 Million RMB Patent Infringement Victory Against CALB - China IP Law Update","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (CATL) Scores 35.8 Million RMB Patent Infringement Victory Against CALB - China IP Law Update","og_description":"In a filing with the Hong Kong Stock Exchange dated February 21, 2023, CALB Group Col., Ltd. (\u4e2d\u5275\u65b0\u822a\u79d1\u6280\u96c6\u5718\u80a1\u4efd\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8) announced that the Fuzhou Intermediate People’s Court ruled against it in a patent infringement lawsuit for lithium-ion batteries. The Court awarded Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (CATL), the world’s largest EV battery producer, 35.8 million RMB in damages, 798 thousand RMB for provisional patent protection (from the time of the patent application publication), over 202 thousand RMB for reasonable expenses, and an ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/","og_site_name":"China IP Law Update","article_published_time":"2023-02-23T01:52:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-02-23T01:52:44+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/CALB.jpg"}],"author":"Aaron Wininger","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Aaron Wininger","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/"},"author":{"name":"Aaron Wininger","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5"},"headline":"Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (CATL) Scores 35.8 Million RMB Patent Infringement Victory Against CALB","datePublished":"2023-02-23T01:52:01+00:00","dateModified":"2023-02-23T01:52:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/"},"wordCount":331,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/CALB.jpg","articleSection":["Case","Patents"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/","name":"Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (CATL) Scores 35.8 Million RMB Patent Infringement Victory Against CALB - China IP Law Update","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/CALB.jpg","datePublished":"2023-02-23T01:52:01+00:00","dateModified":"2023-02-23T01:52:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/CALB.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/CALB.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/02\/contemporary-amperex-technology-co-limited-catl-scores-35-8-million-rmb-patent-infringement-victory-against-calb\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (CATL) Scores 35.8 Million RMB Patent Infringement Victory Against CALB"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/","name":"China IP Law Update","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization","name":"China IP Law Update","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png","width":240,"height":81,"caption":"China IP Law Update"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5","name":"Aaron Wininger","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/2a4c57b1fc56e213ed27e140da54c8a1","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg","caption":"Aaron Wininger"},"description":"Aaron Wininger is a Principal and Director of the China Intellectual Property at Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner.","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/aaron-wininger\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/aaron-wininger-135113\/"],"url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/author\/aaron-wininger\/"}]}},"co_authors":[4],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2444"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2444"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2444\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2448,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2444\/revisions\/2448"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2444"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2444"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2444"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=2444"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}