{"id":2628,"date":"2023-06-08T20:21:59","date_gmt":"2023-06-08T20:21:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/?p=2628"},"modified":"2023-06-12T17:32:57","modified_gmt":"2023-06-12T17:32:57","slug":"2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/","title":{"rendered":"2022 Annual Report of the China National Intellectual Property Administration: 955,000 Patent Applications Were &#8216;Abnormal&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On June 5, 2023, <a href=\"http:\/\/cnipa.gov.cn\">China&#8217;s National Intellectual Property Administration<\/a> (CNIPA) released the 2022 Annual Report of the China National Intellectual Property Administration (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnipa.gov.cn\/col\/col3249\/index.html\">\u56fd\u5bb6\u77e5\u8bc6\u4ea7\u6743\u5c402022\u5e74\u5ea6\u62a5\u544a<\/a>) including statistical data on 2022 patent application filings.\u00a0 In 2022 CNIPA identified 955,000 abnormal patent applications (up 17% on 2021) and 372,100 malicious trademark registrations (down slightly from 2021).\u00a0 As there was a total of 5,365,000 patent applications (invention, utility model and design) filed in 2022, then almost 18% of patent applications in 2022 were abnormal (assuming that the total number of applications filed includes the abnormal applications and have not been removed from the statistics).<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Other data points follow:<\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Patent Prosecution<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>the number of invention patent applications in China was 1.619 million, a year-on-year increase of 2.1%;<\/li>\n<li>the number of authorized invention patents granted was 798,000, a year-on-year increase of 14.7%;<\/li>\n<li>the number of utility model patent applications was 2.951 million, a year-on-year increase of 3.5%;<\/li>\n<li>the number of authorized utility model patents was 2.804 million, a year-on-year decrease of 10.1%;<\/li>\n<li>the number of design patent applications was 795,000, a year-on-year decrease of 1.4%; and<\/li>\n<li>the number of\u00a0authorized design patents was 721,000, a year-on-year decrease of 8.2%.<\/li>\n<li>The invention authorization rate was not released for 2022 but was almost 55% in 2021.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>Trademark Prosecution<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>the number of trademark registration applications was 7.516 million, a year-on-year decrease of 20.5%;<\/li>\n<li>the number of trademark registrations was 6.177 million, a year-on-year decrease of 20.2%; and<\/li>\n<li>the average review period for trademark registration applications is stable at 4 months, and the general trademark registration period is stable at 7 months.\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>Patent Reexamination and Invalidation<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<section>63,000 patent reexamination cases were concluded in 2022, up 16.1%, including:<\/section>\n<ul class=\"list-paddingleft-1\">\n<li>\n<section>Revocation of rejection, accounting for 48.8%;<\/section>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<section>Maintain rejection and others, accounting for 51.2%.<\/section>\n<\/li>\n<li>the average time to conclude a reexamination was 17.2 months.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>7,879 invalidation cases were concluded in 2022, up 11.5%, including:\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Invention<\/span>:\n<ul>\n<li>All claims invalid 27.9%;<\/li>\n<li>Partially invalid 15.4%;<\/li>\n<li>Remain valid 56.7%.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Utility Model<\/span>:\n<ul>\n<li>All claims invalid 41.4%;<\/li>\n<li>Partially invalid 18.7%;<\/li>\n<li>Remain valid 39.9%.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>the average time to conclude an invalidation was 5.7 months.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><figure id=\"attachment_2630\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2630\" style=\"width: 667px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-2630\" src=\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/TopDomesticPatentees2022.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"667\" height=\"466\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/TopDomesticPatentees2022.jpg 667w, https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/TopDomesticPatentees2022-300x210.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 709px) 85vw, (max-width: 909px) 67vw, (max-width: 984px) 61vw, (max-width: 1362px) 45vw, 600px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-2630\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Top Chinese Invention Patentees in China 2022<\/figcaption><\/figure> <figure id=\"attachment_2631\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2631\" style=\"width: 670px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-2631\" src=\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/TopForeignPatentees2022.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"670\" height=\"468\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/TopForeignPatentees2022.jpg 670w, https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/TopForeignPatentees2022-300x210.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 709px) 85vw, (max-width: 909px) 67vw, (max-width: 984px) 61vw, (max-width: 1362px) 45vw, 600px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-2631\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Top Foreign Invention Patentees in China in 2022<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/p>\n<p>The annual report is available <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnipa.gov.cn\/col\/col3249\/index.html\">here<\/a> (Chinese only).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p class=\"excerpt\">On June 5, 2023, China&#8217;s National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) released the 2022 Annual Report of the China National Intellectual Property Administration (\u56fd\u5bb6\u77e5\u8bc6\u4ea7\u6743\u5c402022\u5e74\u5ea6\u62a5\u544a) including statistical data on 2022 patent application filings.\u00a0 In 2022 CNIPA identified 955,000 abnormal patent applications (up 17% on 2021) and 372,100 malicious trademark registrations (down slightly from 2021).\u00a0 As there was a total of 5,365,000 patent applications (invention, utility model and design) filed in 2022, then almost 18% of patent applications in 2022 were abnormal (assuming &#8230;<\/p>\n<p class=\"more-link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/\" class=\"button\">Continue Reading<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,51,4],"tags":[],"coauthors":[22],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v22.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>2022 Annual Report of the China National Intellectual Property Administration: 955,000 Patent Applications Were &#039;Abnormal&#039; - China IP Law Update<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"2022 Annual Report of the China National Intellectual Property Administration: 955,000 Patent Applications Were &#039;Abnormal&#039; - China IP Law Update\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On June 5, 2023, China&#8217;s National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) released the 2022 Annual Report of the China National Intellectual Property Administration (\u56fd\u5bb6\u77e5\u8bc6\u4ea7\u6743\u5c402022\u5e74\u5ea6\u62a5\u544a) including statistical data on 2022 patent application filings.\u00a0 In 2022 CNIPA identified 955,000 abnormal patent applications (up 17% on 2021) and 372,100 malicious trademark registrations (down slightly from 2021).\u00a0 As there was a total of 5,365,000 patent applications (invention, utility model and design) filed in 2022, then almost 18% of patent applications in 2022 were abnormal (assuming ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"China IP Law Update\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-06-08T20:21:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-06-12T17:32:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/TopDomesticPatentees2022.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Aaron Wininger\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Aaron Wininger\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Aaron Wininger\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5\"},\"headline\":\"2022 Annual Report of the China National Intellectual Property Administration: 955,000 Patent Applications Were &#8216;Abnormal&#8217;\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-08T20:21:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-06-12T17:32:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/\"},\"wordCount\":338,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/TopDomesticPatentees2022.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Patents\",\"Statistics\",\"Trademarks\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/\",\"name\":\"2022 Annual Report of the China National Intellectual Property Administration: 955,000 Patent Applications Were 'Abnormal' - China IP Law Update\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/TopDomesticPatentees2022.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-08T20:21:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-06-12T17:32:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/TopDomesticPatentees2022.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/TopDomesticPatentees2022.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"2022 Annual Report of the China National Intellectual Property Administration: 955,000 Patent Applications Were &#8216;Abnormal&#8217;\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/\",\"name\":\"China IP Law Update\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"China IP Law Update\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png\",\"width\":240,\"height\":81,\"caption\":\"China IP Law Update\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5\",\"name\":\"Aaron Wininger\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/2a4c57b1fc56e213ed27e140da54c8a1\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Aaron Wininger\"},\"description\":\"Aaron Wininger is a Principal and Director of the China Intellectual Property at Schwegman Lundberg &amp; Woessner.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/aaron-wininger\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/aaron-wininger-135113\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/author\/aaron-wininger\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"2022 Annual Report of the China National Intellectual Property Administration: 955,000 Patent Applications Were 'Abnormal' - China IP Law Update","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"2022 Annual Report of the China National Intellectual Property Administration: 955,000 Patent Applications Were 'Abnormal' - China IP Law Update","og_description":"On June 5, 2023, China&#8217;s National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) released the 2022 Annual Report of the China National Intellectual Property Administration (\u56fd\u5bb6\u77e5\u8bc6\u4ea7\u6743\u5c402022\u5e74\u5ea6\u62a5\u544a) including statistical data on 2022 patent application filings.\u00a0 In 2022 CNIPA identified 955,000 abnormal patent applications (up 17% on 2021) and 372,100 malicious trademark registrations (down slightly from 2021).\u00a0 As there was a total of 5,365,000 patent applications (invention, utility model and design) filed in 2022, then almost 18% of patent applications in 2022 were abnormal (assuming ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/","og_site_name":"China IP Law Update","article_published_time":"2023-06-08T20:21:59+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-06-12T17:32:57+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/TopDomesticPatentees2022.jpg"}],"author":"Aaron Wininger","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Aaron Wininger","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/"},"author":{"name":"Aaron Wininger","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5"},"headline":"2022 Annual Report of the China National Intellectual Property Administration: 955,000 Patent Applications Were &#8216;Abnormal&#8217;","datePublished":"2023-06-08T20:21:59+00:00","dateModified":"2023-06-12T17:32:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/"},"wordCount":338,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/TopDomesticPatentees2022.jpg","articleSection":["Patents","Statistics","Trademarks"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/","name":"2022 Annual Report of the China National Intellectual Property Administration: 955,000 Patent Applications Were 'Abnormal' - China IP Law Update","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/TopDomesticPatentees2022.jpg","datePublished":"2023-06-08T20:21:59+00:00","dateModified":"2023-06-12T17:32:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/TopDomesticPatentees2022.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/TopDomesticPatentees2022.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2023\/06\/2022-annual-report-of-the-china-national-intellectual-property-administration-955000-patent-applications-were-abnormal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"2022 Annual Report of the China National Intellectual Property Administration: 955,000 Patent Applications Were &#8216;Abnormal&#8217;"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/","name":"China IP Law Update","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization","name":"China IP Law Update","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png","width":240,"height":81,"caption":"China IP Law Update"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5","name":"Aaron Wininger","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/2a4c57b1fc56e213ed27e140da54c8a1","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg","caption":"Aaron Wininger"},"description":"Aaron Wininger is a Principal and Director of the China Intellectual Property at Schwegman Lundberg &amp; Woessner.","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/aaron-wininger\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/aaron-wininger-135113\/"],"url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/author\/aaron-wininger\/"}]}},"co_authors":[4],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2628"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2628"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2628\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2635,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2628\/revisions\/2635"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2628"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2628"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2628"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=2628"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}