{"id":2878,"date":"2024-01-28T15:59:42","date_gmt":"2024-01-28T15:59:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/?p=2878"},"modified":"2024-01-28T15:59:42","modified_gmt":"2024-01-28T15:59:42","slug":"chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/","title":{"rendered":"China’s Supreme People’s Court Upholds 201.54 Million RMB Trade Secret Verdict"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In what is believed to be the largest Chinese trade secret misappropriation verdict ever, China’s Supreme People’s Court affirmed a ruling in favor of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sennics.com\/\">Sennics Chemical Technology Co., Ltd.<\/a>\u00a0 for 201.54 Million RMB against Chen XX and Yuncheng Jinteng Chemical Technology Co., Ltd. (\u8fd0\u57ce\u664b\u817e\u5316\u5b66\u79d1\u6280\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8). <!--more--><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-2879\" src=\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Sennics-scaled.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"2560\" height=\"1267\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Sennics-scaled.jpg 2560w, https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Sennics-300x148.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Sennics-1024x507.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Sennics-768x380.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Sennics-1536x760.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Sennics-2048x1013.jpg 2048w, https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Sennics-1200x594.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 709px) 85vw, (max-width: 909px) 67vw, (max-width: 1362px) 62vw, 840px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The “Nitrobenzene Synthesis of RT Base Technology”\u00a0 and the “Utilization of RT Base to Produce Rubber Antiaging Agent 4020 Process” were first developed by Shandong Sennics Chemical Co., Ltd.\u00a0 Later, Shandong Sennics transferred all the technology to Sennics, and Sennics continued to optimize and improve it. From 2007 to 2012, Chen XX, together with Xiangyu Company and other entities under his actual control, stole the trade secrets involved in the Sennics Company and used the trade secrets involved in the case to\u00a0 build a new production line. Chen and Xiangyu Company were criminally convicted. After the conviction, Chen and Xiangyu Company did not stop the infringement, and Xiangyu Company continued to produce infringing products using the production lines involved in the case. In 2017, Chen established another company, Jinteng Company. Jinteng Company and its Linyi branch continued to use the production line involved in the case and the trade secrets involved in the case to produce infringing products in the factory of Xiangyu Company. Chen and Jinteng Company therefore were jointly infringing.<\/p>\n<p>According to an appraisal report, the market value of Sennics’ trade secrets on April 21, 2012 using the income method was 201.54 million RMB.\u00a0 According to the evidence provided by Sennics, Xiangyu’s business revenue exceeded 2.7 billion RMB over four years, and the average annual sales revenue exceeded 680 million RMB. Considering that the infringement occurred for more than eight years, the court held that the profits earned by Chen and Jinteng from using the trade secrets involved in the case to manufacture and sell infringing products clearly exceeded the 201.54 million RMB claimed by Sennics.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, the SPC upheld the award of 201.54 million RMB.<\/p>\n<p>The case is \uff082022\uff09\u6700\u9ad8\u6cd5\u77e5\u6c11\u7ec8816\u53f7 decided December 27, 2023 and published January 17, 2024.\u00a0 The full text of the decision is available here: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/\uff082022\uff09\u6700\u9ad8\u6cd5\u77e5\u6c11\u7ec8-816-\u53f7.pdf\">\uff082022\uff09\u6700\u9ad8\u6cd5\u77e5\u6c11\u7ec8 816 \u53f7<\/a> (Chinese only).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p class=\"excerpt\">In what is believed to be the largest Chinese trade secret misappropriation verdict ever, China’s Supreme People’s Court affirmed a ruling in favor of Sennics Chemical Technology Co., Ltd.\u00a0 for 201.54 Million RMB against Chen XX and Yuncheng Jinteng Chemical Technology Co., Ltd. (\u8fd0\u57ce\u664b\u817e\u5316\u5b66\u79d1\u6280\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8).<\/p>\n<p class=\"more-link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/\" class=\"button\">Continue Reading<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,39],"tags":[],"coauthors":[22],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v22.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>China's Supreme People's Court Upholds 201.54 Million RMB Trade Secret Verdict - China IP Law Update<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"China's Supreme People's Court Upholds 201.54 Million RMB Trade Secret Verdict - China IP Law Update\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In what is believed to be the largest Chinese trade secret misappropriation verdict ever, China’s Supreme People’s Court affirmed a ruling in favor of Sennics Chemical Technology Co., Ltd.\u00a0 for 201.54 Million RMB against Chen XX and Yuncheng Jinteng Chemical Technology Co., Ltd. (\u8fd0\u57ce\u664b\u817e\u5316\u5b66\u79d1\u6280\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8).\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"China IP Law Update\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-01-28T15:59:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Sennics-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Aaron Wininger\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Aaron Wininger\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Aaron Wininger\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5\"},\"headline\":\"China’s Supreme People’s Court Upholds 201.54 Million RMB Trade Secret Verdict\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-01-28T15:59:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-01-28T15:59:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/\"},\"wordCount\":338,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Sennics-scaled.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case\",\"Trade Secrets\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/\",\"name\":\"China's Supreme People's Court Upholds 201.54 Million RMB Trade Secret Verdict - China IP Law Update\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Sennics-scaled.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-01-28T15:59:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-01-28T15:59:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Sennics-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Sennics-scaled.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"China’s Supreme People’s Court Upholds 201.54 Million RMB Trade Secret Verdict\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/\",\"name\":\"China IP Law Update\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"China IP Law Update\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png\",\"width\":240,\"height\":81,\"caption\":\"China IP Law Update\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5\",\"name\":\"Aaron Wininger\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/2a4c57b1fc56e213ed27e140da54c8a1\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Aaron Wininger\"},\"description\":\"Aaron Wininger is a Principal and Director of the China Intellectual Property at Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/aaron-wininger\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/aaron-wininger-135113\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/author\/aaron-wininger\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"China's Supreme People's Court Upholds 201.54 Million RMB Trade Secret Verdict - China IP Law Update","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"China's Supreme People's Court Upholds 201.54 Million RMB Trade Secret Verdict - China IP Law Update","og_description":"In what is believed to be the largest Chinese trade secret misappropriation verdict ever, China’s Supreme People’s Court affirmed a ruling in favor of Sennics Chemical Technology Co., Ltd.\u00a0 for 201.54 Million RMB against Chen XX and Yuncheng Jinteng Chemical Technology Co., Ltd. (\u8fd0\u57ce\u664b\u817e\u5316\u5b66\u79d1\u6280\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8).","og_url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/","og_site_name":"China IP Law Update","article_published_time":"2024-01-28T15:59:42+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Sennics-scaled.jpg"}],"author":"Aaron Wininger","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Aaron Wininger","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/"},"author":{"name":"Aaron Wininger","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5"},"headline":"China’s Supreme People’s Court Upholds 201.54 Million RMB Trade Secret Verdict","datePublished":"2024-01-28T15:59:42+00:00","dateModified":"2024-01-28T15:59:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/"},"wordCount":338,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Sennics-scaled.jpg","articleSection":["Case","Trade Secrets"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/","name":"China's Supreme People's Court Upholds 201.54 Million RMB Trade Secret Verdict - China IP Law Update","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Sennics-scaled.jpg","datePublished":"2024-01-28T15:59:42+00:00","dateModified":"2024-01-28T15:59:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Sennics-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Sennics-scaled.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2024\/01\/chinas-supreme-peoples-court-upholds-201-54-million-rmb-trade-secret-verdict\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"China’s Supreme People’s Court Upholds 201.54 Million RMB Trade Secret Verdict"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/","name":"China IP Law Update","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization","name":"China IP Law Update","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png","width":240,"height":81,"caption":"China IP Law Update"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5","name":"Aaron Wininger","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/2a4c57b1fc56e213ed27e140da54c8a1","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg","caption":"Aaron Wininger"},"description":"Aaron Wininger is a Principal and Director of the China Intellectual Property at Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner.","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/aaron-wininger\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/aaron-wininger-135113\/"],"url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/author\/aaron-wininger\/"}]}},"co_authors":[4],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2878"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2878"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2878\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2881,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2878\/revisions\/2881"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2878"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2878"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2878"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=2878"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}