{"id":606,"date":"2020-07-24T20:10:47","date_gmt":"2020-07-24T20:10:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/?p=606"},"modified":"2021-03-08T05:10:33","modified_gmt":"2021-03-08T05:10:33","slug":"beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/","title":{"rendered":"Beijing Higher People’s Court Affirms Cancellation of Shanghai Qualcomm Semiconductor’s Trademark"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In a <a href=\"https:\/\/m.iphouse.cn\/verdict\/show\/id\/1199444.html?code=l2ywY2pubpWWZQ==\">decision dated July 14, 2020<\/a>, the <a href=\"http:\/\/bjgy.chinacourt.gov.cn\/index.shtml\">Beijing Higher People’s Court<\/a> affirmed the cancellation of Shanghai Qualcomm Semiconductor Co., Ltd.’s (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.genitop.com\/\">\u4e0a\u6d77\u9ad8\u901a\u534a\u5bfc\u4f53\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8<\/a>) trademark 4305050 for “\u9ad8\u901a” (Gao Tong, the name of Qualcomm in Chinese). This trademark is one of four subject to civil litigation by Shanghai Qualcomm against U.S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.qualcomm.com\/\">Qualcomm<\/a>. In April 2014, Shanghai Qualcomm initiated a trademark infringement and unfair competition lawsuit against Qualcomm in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hshfy.sh.cn\/shfy\/gweb2017\/index.html\">Shanghai High People’s Court<\/a>, claiming that Qualcomm infringed its trademark rights, and requested the court to order Qualcomm to stop the infringement, change the company name, and pay compensation of 100 million RMB.\u00a0 \u00a0This decision affirms the invalidation of the final remaining Shanghai Qualcomm mark that was the basis of that litigation.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Shanghai Qualcomm applied for the the trademark No. 4305050 “Qualcomm”\u00a0 on October 12, 2004, and was registered on March 28, 2008.\u00a0\u00a0It was approved for use in the 42nd category (computer software design; research project research; packaging design, etc.) . On August 12, 2013, U.S. Qualcomm\u00a0 filed an application to cancel the trademark registration with the Trademark Office for non-use for three consecutive years from August 12, 2010 to August 11, 2013. This was unsuccessful but eventually Qualcomm partially succeeded In December 2015 at the Trademark Office. The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board decided to maintain the registration of the trademark in computer software design and other services and revoke the registration in packaging design and interior decoration design.<\/p>\n<p>U.S. Qualcomm then filed an administrative lawsuit with the <a href=\"http:\/\/bjzcfy.chinacourt.gov.cn\/index.shtml\">Beijing Intellectual Property Court<\/a> arguing that Shanghai Qualcomm submitted evidence late without justifiable reasons and the aforementioned evidence did not show the trademark was used within the specified period.\u00a0 The Beijing Intellectual Property Court agreed and ordered the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board to revise their prior decision accordingly.<\/p>\n<p>On appeal, the Beijing Higher People’s Court held that the evidence in the case is insufficient to prove that Shanghai Qualcomm has effectively used the disputed trademark during the designated period, and accordingly rejected Shanghai Qualcomm’s appeal and upheld the judgment of the lower court.<\/p>\n<p>In the civil litigation, the <span>the Shanghai High People’s Court rejected all claims of Shanghai Qualcomm. This trademark invalidation would seem to bring to an end the litigation between U.S. Qualcomm and Shanghai Qualcomm.\u00a0 However, <\/span><span>Shanghai Qualcomm has appealed the Shanghai High People’s Court decision to the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.court.gov.cn\/\">Supreme People’s Court<\/a> and no decision has been issued yet.<\/span><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_607\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-607\" style=\"width: 840px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-large wp-image-607\" src=\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Qualcomm-Mark-984x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"840\" height=\"874\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Qualcomm-Mark-984x1024.jpg 984w, https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Qualcomm-Mark-288x300.jpg 288w, https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Qualcomm-Mark-768x799.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Qualcomm-Mark-24x24.jpg 24w, https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Qualcomm-Mark.jpg 1026w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 709px) 85vw, (max-width: 909px) 67vw, (max-width: 1362px) 62vw, 840px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-607\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Shanghai Qualcomm’s Trademark 4305050<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p> <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p class=\"excerpt\">In a decision dated July 14, 2020, the Beijing Higher People’s Court affirmed the cancellation of Shanghai Qualcomm Semiconductor Co., Ltd.’s (\u4e0a\u6d77\u9ad8\u901a\u534a\u5bfc\u4f53\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8) trademark 4305050 for “\u9ad8\u901a” (Gao Tong, the name of Qualcomm in Chinese). This trademark is one of four subject to civil litigation by Shanghai Qualcomm against U.S. Qualcomm. In April 2014, Shanghai Qualcomm initiated a trademark infringement and unfair competition lawsuit against Qualcomm in the Shanghai High People’s Court, claiming that Qualcomm infringed its trademark rights, and requested …<\/p>\n<p class=\"more-link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/\" class=\"button\">Continue Reading<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,4],"tags":[],"coauthors":[22],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v22.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Beijing Higher People's Court Affirms Cancellation of Shanghai Qualcomm Semiconductor's Trademark - China IP Law Update<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Beijing Higher People's Court Affirms Cancellation of Shanghai Qualcomm Semiconductor's Trademark - China IP Law Update\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a decision dated July 14, 2020, the Beijing Higher People’s Court affirmed the cancellation of Shanghai Qualcomm Semiconductor Co., Ltd.’s (\u4e0a\u6d77\u9ad8\u901a\u534a\u5bfc\u4f53\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8) trademark 4305050 for “\u9ad8\u901a” (Gao Tong, the name of Qualcomm in Chinese). This trademark is one of four subject to civil litigation by Shanghai Qualcomm against U.S. Qualcomm. In April 2014, Shanghai Qualcomm initiated a trademark infringement and unfair competition lawsuit against Qualcomm in the Shanghai High People’s Court, claiming that Qualcomm infringed its trademark rights, and requested ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"China IP Law Update\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-07-24T20:10:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-03-08T05:10:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Qualcomm-Mark-984x1024.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Aaron Wininger\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Aaron Wininger\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Aaron Wininger\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5\"},\"headline\":\"Beijing Higher People’s Court Affirms Cancellation of Shanghai Qualcomm Semiconductor’s Trademark\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-24T20:10:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-03-08T05:10:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/\"},\"wordCount\":405,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Qualcomm-Mark-984x1024.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Case\",\"Trademarks\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/\",\"name\":\"Beijing Higher People's Court Affirms Cancellation of Shanghai Qualcomm Semiconductor's Trademark - China IP Law Update\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Qualcomm-Mark-984x1024.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-24T20:10:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-03-08T05:10:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Qualcomm-Mark-984x1024.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Qualcomm-Mark-984x1024.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Beijing Higher People’s Court Affirms Cancellation of Shanghai Qualcomm Semiconductor’s Trademark\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/\",\"name\":\"China IP Law Update\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"China IP Law Update\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png\",\"width\":240,\"height\":81,\"caption\":\"China IP Law Update\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5\",\"name\":\"Aaron Wininger\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/2a4c57b1fc56e213ed27e140da54c8a1\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Aaron Wininger\"},\"description\":\"Aaron Wininger is a Principal and Director of the China Intellectual Property at Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/aaron-wininger\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/aaron-wininger-135113\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/author\/aaron-wininger\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Beijing Higher People's Court Affirms Cancellation of Shanghai Qualcomm Semiconductor's Trademark - China IP Law Update","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Beijing Higher People's Court Affirms Cancellation of Shanghai Qualcomm Semiconductor's Trademark - China IP Law Update","og_description":"In a decision dated July 14, 2020, the Beijing Higher People’s Court affirmed the cancellation of Shanghai Qualcomm Semiconductor Co., Ltd.’s (\u4e0a\u6d77\u9ad8\u901a\u534a\u5bfc\u4f53\u6709\u9650\u516c\u53f8) trademark 4305050 for “\u9ad8\u901a” (Gao Tong, the name of Qualcomm in Chinese). This trademark is one of four subject to civil litigation by Shanghai Qualcomm against U.S. Qualcomm. In April 2014, Shanghai Qualcomm initiated a trademark infringement and unfair competition lawsuit against Qualcomm in the Shanghai High People’s Court, claiming that Qualcomm infringed its trademark rights, and requested ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/","og_site_name":"China IP Law Update","article_published_time":"2020-07-24T20:10:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-03-08T05:10:33+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Qualcomm-Mark-984x1024.jpg"}],"author":"Aaron Wininger","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Aaron Wininger","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/"},"author":{"name":"Aaron Wininger","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5"},"headline":"Beijing Higher People’s Court Affirms Cancellation of Shanghai Qualcomm Semiconductor’s Trademark","datePublished":"2020-07-24T20:10:47+00:00","dateModified":"2021-03-08T05:10:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/"},"wordCount":405,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Qualcomm-Mark-984x1024.jpg","articleSection":["Case","Trademarks"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/","name":"Beijing Higher People's Court Affirms Cancellation of Shanghai Qualcomm Semiconductor's Trademark - China IP Law Update","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Qualcomm-Mark-984x1024.jpg","datePublished":"2020-07-24T20:10:47+00:00","dateModified":"2021-03-08T05:10:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Qualcomm-Mark-984x1024.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Qualcomm-Mark-984x1024.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/2020\/07\/beijing-higher-peoples-court-affirms-cancellation-of-shanghai-qualcomm-semiconductors-trademark\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Beijing Higher People’s Court Affirms Cancellation of Shanghai Qualcomm Semiconductor’s Trademark"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/","name":"China IP Law Update","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#organization","name":"China IP Law Update","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/cropped-China-IP-Law-Update-Logo-for-website-1.png","width":240,"height":81,"caption":"China IP Law Update"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/cd3c63c8dfee9e4c102809b921868bc5","name":"Aaron Wininger","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/2a4c57b1fc56e213ed27e140da54c8a1","url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/China-IP-Law-Blog-Square-96x96.jpg","caption":"Aaron Wininger"},"description":"Aaron Wininger is a Principal and Director of the China Intellectual Property at Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner.","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/aaron-wininger\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/aaron-wininger-135113\/"],"url":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/author\/aaron-wininger\/"}]}},"co_authors":[4],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/606"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=606"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/606\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":608,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/606\/revisions\/608"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=606"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=606"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=606"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinaiplawupdate.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=606"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}